John Hughes on Erlang and Haskell
John Hughes talks about his experience with Erlang vs. Haskell in an InfoQ Interview . While the discussions about strict vs lazy, pure vs side effecting, and dynamic vs static typing are interesting he raises a good question... [read full story]
|
RELATED
|
|
Haskell Revisited
Yeah, I'm back to looking at it and it really wasn't by choice. You see, I created a small program using D to launch scripts based on some parameters specified in a config file. We need this at work to be able to run some...
And a good thing too
If programs were as dense as mathematics papers, only mathematicians could read them! That would be a disaster. It is a *very good thing* that most programs are less dense than that. When it comes to readability we should be...
The embarrassing way to code
John Hughes talks about his experience with Erlang vs. Haskell in an InfoQ Interview. While the discussions about strict vs lazy, pure vs side effecting, and dynamic vs static typing are interesting he raises a good question...
Basis of Comparison
" If you compare Haskell programs to C code or even C++ often, they are about an order of magnitude smaller and simpler. " What substantial (> 100 KLOC) applications have been written in both languages to warrant such an...
Related categories
International Editions
English - US | English - UK | Deutsch | Français | Español - España | Português - Portugal | Italiano | Čeština | Русский (Russian) | عربي (Arabic) | 中文（简）(Simplified Chinese) | Español - México | Português - Brasil | 한국어 (Korean) | English - India
