Posted on 05/20/2008 10:11:48 AM PDT by Starman417
And now the supplemental spending bill to fund the Iraq and Afghanistan war is going to be vetoed and the Democrats damn well know it. Gives them more talking points in the current election cycle, troops be damned.
How did it get to this point? Blame Pelosi:
How did Congress get itself into this gridlock? The short answer is that the speaker and majority leader placed expediency and control over regular order and transparency, and pursued a strategy that would bypass House and Senate Committee markup, thus forcing the supplemental bill through both bodies with limited debate.And a airdropping of earmarks did happen:Instead of allowing discussion and amendments on perhaps the only appropriations bill to be enacted into law this year, the Democratic leadership has chosen a flawed strategy of congressional self-censorship. In fact, the legislation the Senate Committee will consider has already been largely pre-negotiated with the House.
What is particularly frustrating for many on Capitol Hill is that, with the exception of the eleventh-hour submission of a fiscal 2009 budget amendment by the Office of Management and Budget, the supplemental request by the president has been pending in Congress for more than 14 months.
That may be the gestation period of a donkey, but it should not be how long it takes to consider and pass a funding bill necessary to sustain our troops abroad and other national security programs.
The duties and responsibility of the Congress are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, including in Article 1, Section 8 which provides Congress the power to "provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States" and in Article 1, Section 9 that states that "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by law."
The consequences of bypassing markup in the House, and limiting debate on the floors of both legislative bodies, will be dire. Decisionmaking power shifts away from deliberative committee consensus to the individual determinations of respective committee chairmen, and the majority leader and speaker of the House.
Transparency and accountability are the first casualties. Those concerned with "airdropping" of earmarks should be prepared for an "air assault" of funding and policy decisions by a powerful few.
If Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) looks like he has dishpan hands, it may be from scrubbing the supplemental war spending bill before it hits the Senate floor today.All this could of been avoided if the politicians had just passed a clean spending bill, as asked for by President Bush. But no....its politics as usual and the troops are the ones who will suffer:After a freewheeling Senate Appropriations Committee markup last week that added more than $1 billion to a bill that already posted $9 billion over the president’s request, Senate Democratic aides indicated that an effort was under way to make the measure more difficult for Republicans to oppose and procedurally easier to move across the Senate floor.
It was unclear on Monday what Reid and the Appropriations staff might be trying to eliminate from the bill, but good candidates could be found in several of the amendments adopted during the markup last week. Case in point: Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) amendment to provide limited visas for immigrant agricultural workers, a proposal similar to her long-standing “Ag Jobs” measure.
Besides “Ag Jobs,” Senate Democratic staffers were combing through the bill to identify other provisions that would be subject to points of order, which could create a procedural nightmare for the Majority Leader as he seeks to finish debate on the supplemental before the Memorial Day recess begins on Friday.
Of course, Democratic aides cautioned that efforts to scrub the measure of contentious domestic items might be met with pushback from powerful Democratic Senators, leading to uncertainty about what might be scrapped.
None of this would be a problem if Reid had forced 90-year-old Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) to cancel his markup of the bill. Reid initially attempted to craft a bill with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that would have avoided both House and Senate Appropriations panels, but Byrd was not about to be bypassed considering recent questions raised about his fitness for his job, Democratic aides said.
Despite Reid and Pelosi’s attempts to keep the bill’s domestic provisions narrowly focused on new education programs for veterans and extending jobless benefits, the Senate measure quickly became unwieldy with the addition of $9 billion for programs such as scientific research, local law enforcement grants, highway repair and disaster relief.
Democratic leaders see the additional spending as veto bait and possibly as interfering with their message of providing for veterans and the unemployed. And Republicans agree, saying the Senate committee’s decision to increase the supplemental’s price tag will make it harder for Democrats to tar Republicans as having voted against a new GI bill in the measure.
“There is not going to be a vote on the GI bill. There’ll be a vote on a package that includes the GI bill,” said one senior Senate Republican aide.
The Republicans are hashing out some strategy to deal with this nonsense tho:Chairman Of The Joint Chiefs Notes “We Stop Paying Soldiers On The 15th Of June,” Yet The Majority Leader Claims Speedy Funding Passage Is “No Big Deal”SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): “I think we’ll do our best to finish this before the Memorial Day break, but if we don’t, it’s no big deal.” ("Murtha Doesn't Need Full Committee Markup On War Funds," CongressDaily, 04/18/08)
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS SAYS TROOPS NEED SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING BEFORE MEMORIAL DAY RECESS “VERY BADLY”ADMIRAL MICHAEL MULLEN, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF: “We need [the supplemental appropriations bill] very badly before the Memorial Day recess. We stop paying soldiers on the 15th of June and we have precious little flexibility with respect to that.” (“Mullen Says Pentagon Needs Funds Quickly,” Roll Call, 05/05/08)
DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS CHAIRMAN JOHN MURTHA CONFIRMS ADMIRAL MULLEN’S ASSESSMENT
REP. JOHN MURTHA (D-PA) ON PROVIDING TROOP FUNDING BEFORE JUNE 15: “It Has To Be Done.” ("Murtha Doesn't Need Full Committee Markup On War Funds," CongressDaily, 04/18/08)
(Excerpt) Read more at Flopping Aces ...
The majority of the American people must approve of stiffing their troops. After all, the majority of the American people voted Democrat. The Congress reflects the will of the people.
The will of the people is to put these traitors on trail and to start with the Speaker of the House! At least that is my will!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.