If you are looking for an eyerolling, maudlin Mother's Day story, you don't have to go any farther than the pages of the Washington Post to get a doosie. You see, Ashley Surdin of the Washington Post gave us a tear-jerker of a tale about how the border fence between Mexico and the United States keeps Mothers from being with their children. Yes those mean Americans and their insistence on border security hurts Mommies. To that all I can say is, Oh brother!
In fact, the Post is even claiming that those poor Mexican Mothers can't put their fingers through that nasty, rotten fence to touch the tears on their baby girl's face because if they did they would be punished by the eeeevil U.S. government. And these poor, innocent Mommies are worried that things are getting worse because the U.S. is building "more fences."
Again, I have to say "Oh, brother." Are these people serious with this nonsense?
Look at this schmaltz...
You can walk to the U.S. border, Francelia Menchaca's immigration lawyer advised her, but don't put your fingers through its fence. It may hinder her immigration paperwork, the lawyer said.
But when, after a year apart, Menchaca's mother arrived in her flowered straw hat to the border in Tijuana on Saturday and put her small, wrinkled hands up to the cast-iron gate, Menchaca reached out and touched them.
"Were you anxious to touch my hand?" Menchaca asked in Spanish. Tears stood on her lashes.
"Yes," said her mother, Francisca Rodriguez, a resident of Tijuana, as her three grandchildren, including a 10-month-old girl she had never seen, strained to be near her.
What rot!
Then, after whining that the fence is only "just wide enough to slip a hand or a homemade taco through" the Post regales us on how things are getting worse for these poor Mothers.
Safe gathering spots such as these are few along this increasingly violent boundary, and Saturday may mark the last time families can use them. Amid escalating drug wars — which have recently erupted in bloody nighttime and daytime street shootouts, sending people into hiding in their homes — officials are fortifying the border.
Within the next few weeks, the U.S. government will build more fences in this beachside area. The idea anguishes visitors such as Rodriguez.
Interesting how the WaPo doesn't mention that these drug wars are fought between Mexicans and all the violence is on the Mexican side of the border!
Now, I'm all for Motherhood, it must be pointed out. I feel that all Mothers everywhere should love and nurture their children. But, much as I think this story is all kleanex and BS, I have a solution for all the Mexican Mothers straining to touch the faces of their little girls that reside on the U.S. side of the border. Keep your kids in Mexico with you! See, I do want to keep families together.
Anyway, if anyone can divine the purpose of this Washington Post story other than to make it out as if the U.S. is the bad guy for daring to want to keep their borders under control, I'd like to know what it is?
(Photo credit: Sarah I. Voisin, the Washington Post)
Update: 5/13/08, 3:30 PM
** Editor's note** Newsbuster commenter JasonC made a perfectly logical point. I originally headlined this story with this: "WaPo: Border Fence Ruins Mother's Day for Illegals."
But, as JasonC points out, the story was not talking about illegals. That was my assumption getting through and I failed to make the connection.
Perhaps, this story talked about a Mexican mother who scooted across the border to drop her kid so that the baby would have U.S. citizenship and then the mom ended up back in Mexico for whatever reason but she is also waiting for her legal papers to come through. So, anchor baby or no, this woman is waiting for her papers. I applaud this mom for doing the right thing.
So, JasonC, I agree with your point and have changed the title of this piece accordingly. Thanks for your attention.


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh for crying out loud!
May 13, 2008 - 13:33 ET by HelenSOh for crying out loud! WAAAA!!!
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war" - Shakespeare
Brazen
May 13, 2008 - 13:37 ET by reasonsjesterAnd just what does this have to do with sensible immigration policy, WaPo? Should we have a "meanness scale" to base our policies on? I can see the statistical analysis in a policy paper:
X= Number of tears shed on policy
If X>0, then reject (conservative) policy.
Are you cats out of your gourds?
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
feelings
May 13, 2008 - 14:25 ET by wizardjrRemember reasonsjester, it's always about how it makes you feel. If you feel good about letting invading felons run around mowing down our children while drunk at the wheel "because they had such hardship in their own country," well then, it HAS to be the right thing to do. We'll just drag out a few dozen more therapists and everything will be OK again.
[ an inibriated hispanic invader blew a stop sign and t-boned a school bus up here, killing several elementary school children; authorities tried desperately to hide the illegal status from us ]
Peoples Republic of Minnesota
Even tho'
May 13, 2008 - 23:18 ET by DEVILDOCMOMI do not live in Minnesota, I remember the accident and the attempt to hide the illegal status. We have had a series of wildfires on the border of Arizona and Mexico. All they say is that they are caused by man. Yeh...illegals. Of course you cannot find that information even on our conservative talk station.
Un-Law & Dis-Order
May 14, 2008 - 07:37 ET by reasonsjesterThe scepter and the globus cruciger for the ruling liberal elite in this country.
Hail Caesars! The Visigoths march to Thrace!
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius
enough already
May 13, 2008 - 14:20 ET by wizardjrI'm sick of these fat whales flopping onto our shores and dropping their offspring, anchor babies. It's waaaaay past time to properly interpret the 14th Amendment and stop gifting these rip-off artists with citizenship for their whelps.
As far as separation - send the damn kids with the parents back to whatever craphole they came from. Enough already.
I heard on the radio
May 13, 2008 - 23:20 ET by DEVILDOCMOMtoday that Canada had a similar law...you know, anchor babies. They, however, got rid of the law...sure seems to me if the Canadians can do it, we should be able to do it.
...or if mama really loves
May 13, 2008 - 14:24 ET by tater...or if mama really loves her kids so much she would obtain her citizenship legally so that she wouldn't have to go back to the crap hole country she's from.
"They need to have a course in college called common sense and everyone should take it. Problem is there isn't too many people that could pass or teach it." -my grandfather
they can't
May 13, 2008 - 14:26 ET by wizardjrThey are mostly illiterates with a third grade or less education who cannot speak English to any extent. Many of them have TB and other disqualifying attributes.
What a hoot of a story. I
May 13, 2008 - 14:49 ET by suzycreamcheeseWhat a hoot of a story. I especially love the part about the fence being just wide enough to slip a taco through. You just can't make this stuff up. Thanks for the chuckle!
mother arrived in her flowered straw hat
May 13, 2008 - 15:08 ET by CarlosSOK, I give up..., the flowered straw hat finally did it for me..., open the borders..., let 'em all in..., I can't stand being part of the eeevil U.S. anymore... Waaah! Mmmmammma!
sarc off
Who is the illegal in this
May 13, 2008 - 15:11 ET by JasonCWho is the illegal in this story? Francelia is clearly on the Mexican side, apparently waiting for her paperwork to get pushed through. Is her family on the other side there illegally? If so, how do we know this?
Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva
OK, I've wipe off most of the tears
May 13, 2008 - 15:19 ET by CarlosSMy reading of this soap opera is that:
mother, Francisca Rodriguez, a resident of Tijuana - lives in Mexico
Francelia Menchaca's immigration lawyer advised her - the daughter, lives in U.S., ostensibly legally since she's got a lawyer
mother arrived in her flowered straw hat and put her small, wrinkled hands up to the cast-iron gate and slipped a homemade taco through...! Waahhh! Mmmama! I can't stop crying!
sarc off
It's schmaltzy, I'll
May 13, 2008 - 15:22 ET by JasonCIt's schmaltzy, I'll concede that, but what does it have to do with illegals? It sounds to me like a story about legal immigrants and those who are hopeful for same, doing it exactly by the book. Hence, my puzzlement, RE: the title of Warner's story.
Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva
See edit note
May 13, 2008 - 15:34 ET by Warner Todd HustonJason,
See editor's note at bottom of story.
Thanks
Hey, thanks Warner. And
May 13, 2008 - 15:39 ET by JasonCHey, thanks Warner. And let me reiterate, I more than agree that the story is overly-sentimental dreck.
Who can revolt if man has become a simple conglomerate of organs, a person barely free enough to use a remote control to choose his channel? -J. Kristeva
I'm confused. If the
May 13, 2008 - 15:46 ET by suzycreamcheeseI'm confused. If the daughter is a legal citizen of America, can't she just go to Mexico to visit dear old mom? If no one in this story is an illegal, then there's no story. This article makes it seem like this family is imprisoned in a concentration camp and can only visit through a fence.
Bottom line: It's not America's fault that Mexicans have to come to this country legally or not in order to make a decent living. That's Mexico's problem. And the rest of the world needs to stop villainizing this country because we want our borders protected. U.S. citizens come first in this case.
But that IS the point. They
May 13, 2008 - 16:04 ET by Warner Todd HustonBut that IS the point. They want to make it seem as if the USA is a prison. A nasty, mean prison that hates those poor Mexican mothers.
The 14th Amendment MUST be
May 13, 2008 - 19:46 ET by GregEThe 14th Amendment MUST be changed to stop this anchor baby nonsense. The amendment has far outlived it's purpose - to provide citizenship to children of slaves. There needs to be a big push for this change. It's an open door for more and more illegal activity because if the baby is born here, the free lunches begin. That's GOTTA STOP!!!!!!!
Flowered sombrero, taco,
May 15, 2008 - 11:20 ET by SickofLibsFlowered sombrero, taco, what, no burro?